main through a pull request.
Before opening one
What a reviewer is looking for
The boundaries hold. Dependency direction, migration isolation, tenant-aware execution, worker safety. Most of these are checked mechanically — see Testing and architecture checks — but the rules cannot see intent, only shape. Business logic is in the right place. Controllers and jobs orchestrate; services and domain classes decide. The change is covered. A minimal relevant test, not an exhaustive suite. The code reads like its neighbours. Matching the surrounding conventions matters more than any individual preference — see Coding conventions.Documentation that travels with the change
Documentation lives in this repository, so a change to a public contract and the change to the page describing it belong in the same pull request. That is the point of keeping them together: they cannot drift apart between releases. If a change alters something on the Extending side, it is a change to a public promise. Say so explicitly — see Stability policy.Before it can be merged
A contribution needs the Contributor License Agreement accepted in the pull request itself — see Licence, CLA and trademark for the statement to include and what it grants.Dependencies
Do not add a dependency without agreement. Raise it before the pull request rather than inside it.Contributor License Agreement
A first pull request needs one extra line in its description:CLA.md in the repository root.